🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it feels like it’s time for a re-evaluation. Over the years, an event that began as a commemorative event of heritage, traditions and links between Black populations worldwide, has taken on a corporate feel, expanding to include gatherings where Black people are remunerated to address white audiences about hidden biases and “allyship”. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade generated a rise in the business of showcasing anti-racist commitment. However, that period has concluded. The wave has crested, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what increasing understanding is for.

The Origins of Black History Observance

Initially celebrated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was established in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with a week of remembrance and recognition in the second week of February. Black History Month evolved from this campaign and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the United States and Canada in winter, but also in October in the United Kingdom, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the Holland.

The month has transformed since that time, focusing less on the histories of the slave trade across the Atlantic and civil rights battles, and more on prominent Black figures in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and widely honoring the impact Black people have made to shape the country. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with talks and cultural events. But the manner the observance is observed is a manifestation of the current political situation. How it evolves is a instructive case in how appropriation leads to dismantling: the reshaping of Black History Month has hindered the objective of it, which is to tackle embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Jarring Moment

Few things illustrate how crucial it is to rethink Black History Month better than the particular moment in which it takes place this year. In the UK, a resurgent right in the guise of the Reform party is ahead in surveys. In the summer we saw the largest far-right rally in British history. the Conservative leader, the African descendant in charge of the right-wing political group, is a strong critic of anti-racism activism, and we are in a place where a member of parliament feels emboldened to declare that a lack of white people in parts of a city is a source of worry. Simultaneously, far-right parties are growing in Europe as a entirety.

In the America, a massive attack against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been carried, often successfully, to the highest courts of the country. A campaign to erase African American heritage and experience from the historical documents is under way. One of the former president's early administrative commands focused on the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the Smithsonian Institution, alleging that they of a coordinated and broad attempt to alter the country's historical narrative” by depicting the United States “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

In this context, the observance represents how insufficiently it can be impactful if it is restricted to either obligatory business commemorations, or stripped of political content commemorations of former accomplishments, rather than challenging the conditions of the contemporary world. It also shows how its limited duration means that it is disconnected from the wider consistent effort that is required. An academic expert, a educator at an educational institution, put it best when she raised concerns about the short-term symbolic gestures of the observance. “The difficulty with adopting a symbolic stance”, she commented, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month becomes a brief show rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Determining how to alter, change and broaden actions for racial equality and recognition in such times of discouragement and concern is a difficult task. There is a urge to just do away with events including Black History Month completely, thinking they are inadequate for current needs, or are remnants of an era that has been ineffective.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and tradition of activism for racial justice – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, inclusion and equity efforts, and indeed, including corporate presentations – constitute an framework that a considerable labor has gone into. It is there not only to deteriorate as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, regresses), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month look like? To begin with, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is spread out throughout the annual calendar (as certain organizations are already starting to implement), sections of its curriculum (particularly around notable African descendants) incorporated into educational programs. It would also be a period that does not evade governmental matters, and provides room for individuals, particularly young people, to share their anxieties and narratives. What value has mere awareness of the past when it doesn’t reckon with the present reality of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the street? Organizations who observe it should not be comforted with the passive language of hidden discrimination and awareness of “microaggressions”, but challenged by the risks that impact society if fight against prejudice is not taken seriously. In short, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, critical, and responsive. Perhaps an entire name rebrand is in order – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.